logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.02.18 2011고단144
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도) 등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on July 10, 2003; on April 15, 2005, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny; on July 19, 2007, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Northern District Court on April 2, 2008; on May 14, 2008, the execution of the final sentence was completed; on May 14, 2008, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced two years of suspended execution with prison labor for larceny; on February 4, 2010, the Defendant was released from the Seoul Northern District Court on March 31, 2010, and the final appeal became final and conclusive by the Supreme Court on June 1, 2010.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. On January 1, 201, the first criminal defendant found the victim D who was parked on the front road of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul at around 23:30, the market price of the victim D, which is equivalent to KRW 400,000, E 100, and 100, he/she was driving by her prior her vehicle by her key.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

B. On January 1, 201, at around 23:40, the second criminal defendant: (a) discovered that when he flabed by using the flab, which was cut off on the front of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, with a view to gathering a female room, flabing the target of the room, and flabing the female room on the flab by the victim G with a female room on the flab by the victim G; and (b) flabing the victim from the above flab, and flabing him with a room containing four credit cards, such as one "a flad" (flad) and a national card, etc., the market price of the victim’s possession was 780,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant habitually stolen the victims’ property worth KRW 1,180,000 in total, on two occasions, as indicated above.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act;

arrow