1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 130,484,384 won;

B. The above case is jointly and severally with the defendant A.

(b) the money stated in subsection (3).

1. Judgment on the party's assertion

A. However, there is no dispute between the parties as to the grounds for the judgment on the grounds of the claim (i.e., “creditor”, “debtor”, and “Defendant”) and the facts indicated on the changed grounds of the claim. Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount stated in the purport of the claim.

B. The Defendants’ assertion against Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E asserted that, in the inheritance of the network F (hereinafter “the network F”)’s property, a qualified acceptance report was accepted, the said Defendants’ liability should be limited to the scope of the property inherited from the deceased.

The deceased died on February 26, 2016, and on March 8, 2016, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E, the wife of the deceased, the co-inheritors of the deceased, filed a request for a trial on the declaration of qualified acceptance of inheritance (2016-Ma362) with the Daejeon District Court on March 8, 2016, and received the adjudication from the above court on March 21, 2016 that the above report of qualified acceptance of inheritance was accepted by the above court on March 21, 201. The above Defendants’ assertion is with merit.

2. If so, the defendants are obligated to pay the money to the plaintiff as stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A and the remaining claims against the defendants within the above recognition scope are justified. The remaining claims against the defendants are dismissed as they are without merit.