The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the facts of the crime No. 5 in the judgment of the court below, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, although the defendant did not provide the J with a philopon on the date and time of the crime of the court below. The judgment of the court below

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of facts comprehensively adopted and examined the evidence as follows; i.e., (i) the investigative agency stated that “the J was administered in a way that wraps the Defendant after being provided the phiphones from the near F around March 20, 2017,” and stated that “the date is not accurate, but the Defendant was provided with the phiphones once from the Defendant.” (ii) The details of giving and receiving telephone conversationss and text messages between the Defendant and J are confirmed at the time of the time indicated in this part of the facts charged, and the location of the base station transmitting each mobile phone is close to the Seoul Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to this part of the facts charged; (iii) the J was convicted of having received the phiphones and administered the phiphones, and (iv) the investigation agency and the Defendant stated that the Defendant provided the Mephones to the Defendant at the time of the lower court’s oral statement and its reasoning are not consistent.”

B. The Defendant’s judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing is divided into one’s mistake with respect to most crimes, and the instant crime has become final and conclusive.