A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 3 through 6 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The name and poorer who is the cause of telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scaming”) is so-called “ telephone counselor”, and then withdraws cash by misrepresenting a large number of unspecified domestic people to the public prosecutor’s office, and then making a false statement to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, such as having the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service confirm whether the crime was committed. The Defendant, as the so-called “passing”, conspired in order to acquire the property by means of receiving cash from the victim from the victim to the prepared account (one-time “one-time one-time one account”) or remitting the property.

In accordance with this public invitation, the above person who was not aware of his name had the victim withdraw the deposit by telephone, and the defendant had the victim receive the cash withdrawn from the victim and received the cash in the name of the Chairperson of the Financial Services Commission. The defendant had the victim receive the cash from the victim and intended to play the role of depositing or remitting the deposit into the large passbook account.

1. On July 31, 2019, at around 13:41, 201, at a place where a location is unknown, the Defendant presented to the victim B a “public document tracking a financial account tracking civil petition under the name of the Chairperson of the Financial Services Commission, a forged public document, at around 17:06 of the same day, and received KRW 14 million from the victim after presenting a “public document tracking a financial account tracking civil petition” under the name of the Chairperson of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Financial Supervisory Service on the one hand, where the amount of damage is more than 2 billion won by financial fraud. Even before the investigation of the instant case, there was a face-to-face circulation account in the victim’s name during the investigation of the instant case. It is necessary to confirm whether the Defendant is a suspect or a victim.

However, the victim was not involved in any crime, and the defendant was not an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and the defendant was the victim.