logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.11.29 2018가단711
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

Description of Claim

On May 4, 2017, the Plaintiff leased a building listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as KRW 5 million, KRW 350,000 per month (payment on May 16, 201), and the period from May 16, 2017 to 24 months.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement.” Under the instant lease agreement, the Defendant agreed to pay the deposit to the Plaintiff as substitute for the expenses for remodelling construction on the instant building. In the event that the lessee fails to pay the deposit for more than two years, the lessor may terminate the contract.

However, the Defendant did not implement remodeling construction for the instant building, and did not pay the tea after July 16, 2017.

Accordingly, on October 26, 2018, a duplicate of the complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant lease agreement, was served on the Defendant.

Therefore, since the lease contract of this case terminated upon termination, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff with its restoration to its original state.

Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow