logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.25 2015고단3799
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. Around February 2013, the Defendant agreed to receive 4% of the loan amount in the form of a financial consulting contract from K and directors L and M, a real operator of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) upon the request of the owner of the building, to receive the payment for purchase of the site from the owner of the building, and to receive 4% of the loan amount in the form of a financial consulting contract, upon the request of the J to the effect that “The J shall enter into the construction contract with the owner of the building and build the telecom, etc. on the site under the name of the owner of the building.” If the owner of the building procures the contract for purchase of the site, the remaining intermediate payment and remainder of the site, and the construction cost of the building, etc. from the financial institution.”

A. On February 2013, the Defendant was an employee in charge of K and accounting, who was the actual operator of the said J, at the J office located in Songpa-gu Seoul N on February 2, 2013.

O. “Any funds related to the Incheon Pel construction project to be promoted by the J is necessary. If the J is jointly and severally guaranteed and later sells the telecom, it is intended to directly repay the loan, so that Q, the construction cost equivalent to KRW 1.5 billion for purchasing the telecom site and KRW 3.0 billion for the telecom, and if the loan is made, 4% of the loan amount shall be paid upon request from the R Savings Bank from March 21, 2013 to June 30, 2014.” The money was transferred from the R Savings Bank in total from KRW 3,483,71,481 to the K Savings Bank from February 28, 2013 to the K Savings Bank from KRW 3,483,71,481, and then, around February 28, 2013 to the K Savings Bank from around May 15, 2013 to the K Savings Bank from around February 15, 2013.

As a result, the defendant received KRW 100 million on the intermediation of matters belonging to the duties of officers and employees of financial institutions.

B. The Defendant, on May 2013, is the Songpa-gu Seoul N around 2013.

arrow