Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Broscom.
On May 30, 2013, at around 09:15, the Defendant driven the above mick and proceeded straight along the four-distance intersection in front of the Roman-dong Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with one-lane one way from the right intersection to the right intersection.
At that time, since the traffic control is conducted by the signal apparatus, the defendant has a duty of care to accurately check the signal signal, etc. and safely proceed with the signal.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the part on the left side of the Victim C(68 years old) driving DNEW EF rocketing and other automobiles running directly from the direction right side of the next mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mix of the mar.
As a result, the Defendant caused the victim C to suffer injury, such as a cage cage cages at the left-hand side in need of approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and the victim E (68 years of age) who was aboard the said car suffered injury to the victim E (68 years of age) without any open room within the river that requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of C and E;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment prescribed for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims C which have become more severe in the judgment of each crime on the grounds that such crime is committed);
1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;
1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the most favorable circumstances for sentencing") is due to the negligence in violation of the signal, and the occurrence thereof.