[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months

[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year

[Defendant C]

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant B’s criminal records] On March 27, 2015, the Daegu District Court sentenced Defendant B to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., and completed the enforcement of the sentence at the Daegu Detention Center on May 24, 2015.

Defendant

C On November 13, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, etc., and on September 30, 2015, the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 11, 2015.

[2] Defendant C is a person in charge of the overall management of the game site, such as Ansan-dong, G and 102 “H” (hereinafter “the instant game site”)’s instructions to operate the game site, the game machine established in the instant game site, and the game machine exchange for customers. Defendant B is a person in charge of the overall management of the instant game site, such as raising the game machine installed in the instant game site and providing customers with subscription rights to money exchange. Defendant A is a person in charge of the overall management of the game site, and Defendant A invests the game operating fund in the instant game site, exchanged the game machine acquired against customers in cash, and exchanged the game machine acquired against them in the event of the occurrence of the instant crime.

No one is allowed to exchange or arrange the exchange of intangible results obtained through the use of a game product. However, the Defendants conspired to share the above roles and exchanged the amount of cash equivalent to 10% of the commission from March 31, 2016 to May 20, 2016 by installing 40 game machine in this game in the title “piracy” and “the joint and several interests of the prime party” in this game, and providing them to customers, and from the game points received as a result of the game, the Defendants exchanged the amount of cash equivalent to 10% of the commission to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Previouss before ruling: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history;