beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 22, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant C with the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court 2008Gaso38743 (former District Court). On November 6, 2008, the conciliation was concluded by Defendant C to pay eight million won to the Plaintiff.
B. On October 30, 2012, the Plaintiff, based on the above protocol of mediation, issued a decision to seize corporeal movables on the corporeal movables (e.g., the corporeal movables (e., the instant compulsory execution) in the dwelling area of Defendant C, under the Seogu District Court Branch Branch 2012No2510, pursuant to the said protocol, on October 30, 2012.
C. However, on November 16, 2012, D filed a lawsuit by a third party against the Plaintiff with respect to the instant compulsory execution by the Seogu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court 2012Da33628, and filed an application for the suspension of compulsory execution with the same court 2012Ka726 on the 20th of the same month, and received a decision to suspend the instant compulsory execution on the condition that the said court deposit KRW 500,000 from the said court as security.
D withdrawn the lawsuit in the above lawsuit against the remaining corporeal movables except for the ELI electronic sirens, Habro Kimchi, 3rd agricultural and Samsung laundry, and eventually, on February 19, 2013, the above court rendered a judgment that rejected the part of the instant compulsory execution against ELI electronic sirens, Habro Kimchi cooling, and 3rd agricultural and Samsung laundry. The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
(D) On July 9, 2013, Defendant C and Defendant C were issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 for each of the criminal facts that concealed the remaining corporeal movables except for the farming and Samsung laundry for the purpose of evading compulsory execution in relation to the above lawsuit. The said summary order became final and conclusive on July 25, 2013.
After that, Defendant B, an son of Defendant C, against the Plaintiff on February 22, 2013, corporeal movables.