1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 142,731,490 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff C, respectively, and KRW 3,00,000,00 to Plaintiff D and E.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 4, 2012, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as the species of the Defendant G, a doctor of the Defendant hospital, at the end of 11-12 plehym in the Busan Simnasium (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by Defendant F, due to the symptoms of low pain and quantity. On October 12, 2012, Plaintiff A was administered with a plehym 11-12 plehym crym crym (hereinafter “instant operation”).

B. On October 15, 2012, Plaintiff A complained of the left-hand bridge and the sloping part of the sloping part of the instant surgery (hereinafter “instant symptoms”), the Plaintiff transferred the instant sloping area to the Nancheon University Shipping Madung Hospital (hereinafter “Madung Hospital”).

C. On October 15, 2012, Plaintiff A received an emergency surgery to remove part of the species remaining from the medical staff of a white hospital, and received rehabilitation treatment, but is still in a state in which walking is difficult due to the defluence of the left-hand ray at present (hereinafter “instant disability”).

On the other hand, as a result of the tissue testing conducted by the white hospital, the species of the instant case were confirmed to be local species (a spoma and the string consisting of mature local cells generated from the local organization of the body).

E. Plaintiff C is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D and E are the children of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-3, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Gap evidence 7-8, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 19-1, 2, Gap evidence 7-8, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 19; the result of this court's physical examination entrusted to the director

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion (1) is that the instant species are serious to the risk of negotisis in the process of removing the species due to the negotisis of the negotisis, and as such, Defendant G confirmed whether the instant species are cultivated or not in the process of performing the instant surgery to the Plaintiff A, and if training is conducted, it would be at least to the extent that the relevant negotisis is resolved.