A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of interfering with the theft and D’s business is not guilty.

Criminal facts

On July 18, 2012, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced the defendant to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on March 19, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who has weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, dependence on alcohol use, etc.

around 02:00 on February 2, 2012, the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties for a police officer dispatched to the site according to 112 report by the victim's 112 report, as a drinking value problem from the "J main point" operated by the victim in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

(Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2012No626 Decided July 18, 2012). Around 15:05 on April 6, 2013, the Defendant damaged property by breaking out the air-conditioning room in order to deduct the bricks from the “J main office”, and then breaking out the air-conditioning room with a cement brick that was cut off under the air-conditioning room, and then breaking the glass door (Garo 90cm x vertical length 190cm) owned by the victim, thereby damaging the property by breaking the metal part into the glass part.

Defendant

In addition, the defense counsel asserts that there was no loss of property as stated in this part of the crime. However, according to the evidence, the fact that the defendant deducteds the wall in which he was receiving the air conditioner from the air conditioner, and caused the defect at the entrance of the main entrance of this case, and that the wall was damaged beyond the air conditioner in the course of deducting it from the wall, it is reasonable to view the above act as impairing the utility of air conditioner, and therefore, this part of the defendant and the defense counsel's assertion is rejected.

As above, the defendant is under criminal punishment upon the victim's report, and the victim reports the defendant to the police for the same crime as the preceding paragraph.