logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고단5000
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in dump truck driving.

On April 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on April 11:45, 2016, and led to the left-hand turn to the left-hand turn from the direction of transmission.

At all times, the signal has been installed and operated, so there was a duty of care to turn to the left according to the good.

Nevertheless, in violation of the signal, the left-hand turn is continuously going to the right-hand turn, while continuing to go to the south of the speed, the driver drivened a motor vehicle in front of the Djust station located in the same Gu, using the spacker installed in the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, with the driver’s vehicle “h. C. C. . . . . . . immediately safe driving), and the driver driven a spack by causing danger to the driver’s traffic by driving the motor vehicle, such as going beyond the central line at the front intersection and violating the signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A national manual;

1. A report on investigation (to attach image images of damaged vehicles) and images attached thereto;

1. Application of unmanned Cameras control photographs (B)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and subparagraphs 1 and 2 of Article 151-2, and subparagraphs 1 and 2 of Article 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the motive and circumstances leading up to the instant crime, and the details of the instant crime; however, the Defendant did not have the same criminal records; the Defendant violated other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes or does not actually cause danger to traffic, such as traffic accidents; the Defendant’s mistake is late; and the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc. are considered in all other circumstances where the sentencing conditions of the instant crime are imposed.

arrow