1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The content asserted by the Plaintiff in this court is not significantly different from the content claimed by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship between the death and pneumoconiosis of the deceased even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was re-examineed based on the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court, and in the same purport, the first instance judgment that the instant disposition is lawful

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is as follows: (a) the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: (b) 3 pages 5 of the judgment of the first instance; (c) 5 pages 8, 8 pages 16, “this court” as “the first instance court”; and (d) 7 pages 5 as “the chronic closed-pulmonary disease” as “the chronic closed-pulmonary disease,” and (e) 7 pages 5 as “the chronic closed-pulmonary disease,” and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance; and (e) accordingly, (c) 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.