logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.21 2015가합567888
추심금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 71,397,513 as well as 5% per annum from January 15, 2016 to June 21, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 17, 201, the Plaintiff received a seizure and collection order (hereinafter “B’s benefit claim”) against the Defendant with respect to the benefit (including various allowances and bonuses) claim (including various bonuses) claim against the Defendant as the Seoul Western District Court 2004Da38640, the former District Court 2004Gaga38640, which made the obligor B and the third obligor KRW 1,327,937,591, by means of an executory exemplification of the judgment in the claim amount, and issued a seizure and collection order (hereinafter “instant claim seizure and collection order”), and the above claim seizure and collection order were served on the Defendant on October 20, 201.

The specific scope of the benefit claim B attached by the seizure and collection order as mentioned above shall be as follows:

When B retires or retires between the claimed amount 1,327,937,591 and the amount of salaries (this salary and allowances) received every month from the defendant and the end-of-age allowances (in the case of bonuses) received in June and December of each year, one half of the balance obtained by subtracting the tax and public charges from the tax and the public charges, and the amount of the above claim until it reaches the claimed amount (However, in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act, if the amount falls under the amount prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act, the remaining amount excluding such amount, if the amount falls under the amount prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the cost of living of standard households), and the amount of the above claim, within the limit of one half of the balance

Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Seoul Guarantee Insurance") 1) Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Seoul Guarantee Insurance").

the debtor B and the third debtor as Seoul Western District Court 201TT221 on January 25, 201, by means of an executory exemplification of the judgment in the claim amount case No. 2001Gadan22418, the Jeonju District Court 201.

arrow