logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.23 2017고단249
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking), etc. by the same court on September 3, 2013, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on December 15, 2014. On October 10, 2016 (drawing on September 13, 2016), and was notified of a fine of KRW 6 million due to a violation of road traffic laws (dacting) in the Seo branch of the Daegu District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle Ban on the road surface, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, in violation of the Road Traffic Act, in violation of the Road Traffic Act, in violation of the Road Traffic Act, in violation of the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant, as above, violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice. On September 30, 2016, at around 18:34, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without mandatory insurance in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.104% while under the influence of alcohol during blood without obtaining a driver’s license. On September 30, 2016, the Defendant stopped the road front of the Daegu-gu Police Station New Police Station in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, located in 2133-48 on the four-distance boundary of the direction, and stopped pursuant to good faith.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the brake system by operating it accurately and preventing conflicts with other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and took care of the car driven by the Defendant by removing from the balc peds, and subsequently was driven by the victim D(44 ) of the victim D, which was stopped later, the Defendant was driven by the lower end of the said car driven by the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above duties to take part in light of the following: (a) the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s cather, the right-hand bed, and the left-hand bed; and (b) at the same time, the Defendant’s bats car was damaged by the repair cost of KRW 2,69,345.

2...

arrow