1. The Defendant’s KRW 83,985,956 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 5, 2013 to February 10, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 5, 2013, a driver affiliated with high-speed tourism, who was off the Gyeong-ro, a company, driving a large b-sized passenger vehicle owned by the said company (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”) on or around 09:19, and driving the said company at around 14 roads in front of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Seosan-gu, 292, at the outer circulation speed of the Seoul.

The accident occurred that, due to negligence of neglecting the Jeonju City, finds a vehicle stopped in the signal atmosphere on the front side late, and makes it possible to change the lane into one lane, but did not stop, and the vehicle stopped in the signal atmosphere on the front side but did not stop at the same time (hereinafter referred to as the "accident").

B. The Plaintiff, who was on board the instant vehicle, sustained injury, such as Masle Masle Masle Masle Masle Masle Masle.

C. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with the new world tourism off the company as to the instant accident vehicle.

[Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of the accident in this case.

B. As to this, the defendant did not wear the Safety Ballast at the time of the accident of this case, and the defendant's liability should be limited since the damage occurred due to neglecting hospital treatment after the accident of this case. However, since there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. (1) Loss of lost income equivalent to the monetary total appraised value of the capacity to operate due to the instant accident by the Plaintiff is sought by the Plaintiff based on the facts and assessment as set forth below 1.