logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.10.02 2014고정1116
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2013, around 19:30 on November 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the office in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant, along with the victim F (72 years of age) and the victim F (72 years of age); (b) while having a dispute with the victim, the victim was faced with the victim's face by her head, the victim was faced with the victim's face by her head; and (c) the victim was injured by the victim, such as galive and galive in the area of the eye, which requires approximately one week of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant F’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant asserts that the victim’s mother and child is only friendly to the victim’s face, and even if a larlar is in contact with the victim’s face, the victim’s wife does not constitute injury.

2. The reasoning of the defendant is difficult to believe in light of the following circumstances, and the facts charged against the defendant is sufficiently recognized according to the above evidence.

① In light of the fact that in this court, the witness G stated that the Defendant had the mother and child of the victim in hand, and the part of the defendant's clothes retail among the defendant's clothes was left in the face of the victim, and the defendant also recognized the fact that the mother and child of the victim was friendly, it seems that the part of the defendant's clothes retail among the defendant's clothes retail was damaged by the victim's eye.

② On November 29, 2013, the victim received a medical examination and treatment at H’s request and received a medical examination of injury. The name of the disease is “each eye,” “gymballing and eyeballing in the area of eyeball and eyeball,” and “any other sacrines in the area of eyeball,” and the part of the injury is the upper part of the sacrine part.

arrow