1. The Defendant is based on the ratio of KRW 71,200,000 to KRW 8,400,000 per month from November 19, 2016 to June 8, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 13, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased bonds of Nos. 101, 102, 201, 202, 301, 302, 401, and 402 of the E-building No. 3 (hereinafter “each of the instant houses”) from the Defendant for KRW 750 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 9, 2016.

B. At the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Defendant agreed with the Plaintiff to be liable for the lease contract for two years from June 9, 2015, and to guarantee the monthly rent for two years (8.4 million won per month) in the event of nonperformance.

hereinafter referred to as the "instant special agreement"

(c) On April 1, 2016, lessees of each of the instant housing leased the lease contract was terminated, and the Defendant paid only 4.4 million won out of the monthly rent of 8.4 million won from February 19, 2016 to March 18, 2016. (In the absence of any dispute over recognition, the fact that there is no ground for dispute over recognition, and the purport of the entire entries and arguments set forth in subparagraphs 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the facts of the determination on the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant was obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 8.4 million each month from June 8, 2017, according to the instant special agreement, the amount of KRW 7.1.2 million ( KRW 4 million from February 2016 to October 2016 ( KRW 8.4 million x 8 months) and KRW 7.2 million from November 19, 2016 to June 8, 2017, according to the instant special agreement.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.