Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the job classification work in the E-2 floor in Yangsan-si operated by the victim C (46) in Yangsan-si.

around 23:00 on October 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed one cell phone in the market value equivalent to KRW 899,800 and two cell phone cases in the market value equivalent to KRW 19,800 on purpose, which were prepared in advance, on the part of the Defendant’s bank by intentionally fall under the bottom of the market value of KRW 19,800; and (b) stolen them.

From around that time to November 24, 2016, the Defendant stolen each of the objects managed by the victim by the same method five times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from around that time to around 23:0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: (a) the defendant stolen goods from the classification of goods he/she works for about one month during the period of approximately one month; (b) the total amount of damage reaches KRW 2,883,800; (c) the damage was most recovered; and (d) the defendant has been punished three times by a fine due to a violation of the Automobile Management Act of this case; (c) a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and a violation of Road Traffic Act (a violation of the Road Traffic Act) prior to the instant case; and (d) the defendant has recently purchased his/her own truck and used it to deliver food materials to large marina in the future.

It takes into account the fact that it reflects the mistake in depth.