A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant was living in Ulsan-gu C apartment 305 dong 110, Ulsan-gu, 305 dong 110, the Defendant was unable to properly locked due to noise between floors, it was judged that the Defendant paid the noise between floors, such as aluriium, etc. in the same 210 - which is the upper floor in which the victim D resides, and that the Defendant used the victim’s apartment corridor, wall surface, door door, etc. with his own seal and other

On January 12, 2014, at around 19:16, the Defendant, at around 305, 210, the residence of the victim of Ulsan-gu C apartment, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, 305, 210, the Defendant had impaired the utility of the Defendant’s person prepared in advance, such as putting the Defendant’s person under his corridor window, etc., from that time to February 5, 2014, by the following method: (a) from February 5, 2014, the Defendant had impaired the effectiveness of the victim’s residence, such as the corridor, wall, door door, etc. in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Ctv photographs and photographs of a place to be damaged by the suspect, photographs of a wall of an apartment (three copies), photographs of an on-site CCTV taken on the wall of the apartment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. If the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act was the case where the defendant suffered from noise between floors, it is concluded that the noise had been resolved through an apartment autonomous body or management office without confirming the occurrence of noise at a certain place, and that the neighbor was generated from the above floor, and that the crime was committed by causing mental or physical harassment and fears due to personality, waste, etc., and thus, the defendant selects imprisonment with prison labor due to a large amount of injury in terms of its nature and circumstances.

However, the fact that the defendant reflects the error in depth, was a director from the above apartment, was smoothly agreed with the victim, and there was no previous conviction.