logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가합13100
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to Defendant C and D’s respective Plaintiff KRW 500,000,000 and as to Defendant C, from September 6, 2012 to May 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 21, 2009, the Plaintiff was declared incompetent by the Seoul Family Court, and Defendant C, the Plaintiff’s grandchild, was appointed as the Plaintiff’s guardian.

B. Defendant C and D issued a false promissory note as if the Plaintiff had a debt of KRW 500,00,000 to Defendant D and had it notarized, using it, offered to acquire KRW 500,000,000 of the claim for a specified money trust deposit against the Plaintiff’s bank. Defendant C and D, on August 9, 2012, prepare a false promissory note with the issuer’s “A”, “D”, “50,000,000,000”, and “payment at sight”, and Defendant C and D, a notary public, prepared a written request for the notarial deed with respect to a promissory note on the same day, and then, Defendant C and D, a law firm, a law firm, “the Defendant law firm” and “the Defendant law firm, a law firm,” and

(C) On August 21, 2012, the Defendant D transferred the said deposit claim to E on September 6, 2012, after receiving the attachment and assignment order of the claim against the Plaintiff’s deposit claim against the bank of Seoul Northern District Court as Seoul Northern District Court 2012TTTT14250 on August 21, 2012, with the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression stated as “Incompetent and legal representative C,” the attorney-at-law in charge confirmed the right of representation of the Defendant C, and prepared and kept a promissorysory note with the purport of recognizing compulsory execution. The Defendant D transferred the said deposit claim to the Defendant D on September 7, 2012. As seen above, the Defendant D’s judgment was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six years, with prison labor for fraudulent entry in the original notarial deed, for fraudulent entry in the original notarial deed, for fraudulent entry in the original notarial deed, for the Plaintiff’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes.

arrow