logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고단3593
특수공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B of fine of 2,000,000 won, Defendant C of fine of 1,50,000 won, and Defendant D of this case.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is the head of the relevant Trade Union G division, and the operator belonging to G is the head of the relevant Trade Union G division, and Defendant B, C, and D is the operator belonging to each of the above Trade Union G division.

From March 13, 2012, labor union members including the Defendants were engaged in the strike by negotiating with five pre-city buses including G and H from March 13, 2012, but the strike continues to exist for more than three months, and since March 20, 2012, labor union members including the Defendants were placed in an economic difficult situation because they were unable to receive wages due to a lock-out by the employer. As such, all these circumstances were considered to have failed to play a proper role at the pre-market price, and they were dissatisfied with the complaint against the pre-market.

Accordingly, on June 18, 2012 and June 22, 2012, the number of 50 of the union members, including the Defendants, belonging to the above union members including the Defendants, requested an interview with the former union members to find out in the former union members around June 18, 2012, and demanded an interview with the former union members, and the former market operator pressures on his own to direct deliver to the former union members a letter demanding the resolution of the intra-city bus strike business, and even if the public officials belonging to the former union members preventing them enter the former union building to directly interview the former market and deliver the above letter to the former union members.

1. On June 20, 2012, Defendants A and D’s special obstruction of the performance of official duties were intended to directly enter the former City Mayor in order to deliver a letter to the former City Mayor, along with other members of the former City Mayor, in front of the former Sin-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the former City Mayor, who was performing the duty of protecting the office building in front of the present site of the said building, by blocking the former City Mayor, who was a registered security guard belonging to the former City Mayor, and thereby making it difficult to enter the building. Defendant A was able to drive the part of the above I’s clothes lower than the above I’s clothes by hand.

arrow