1. The defendant is based on the restoration of the true name with respect to the return of 3,091 square meters in Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun.

There is no dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence and the entire argument, the plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to the land of this case with the defendant who is a convict on September 27, 1994, and the fact that the plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to the land of this case to the defendant on September 27, 1994.

As for the instant land, the ownership transfer registration completed in the Defendant’s future is in accordance with the title trust agreement and is null and void pursuant to Article 4(2) of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the instant land

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Da35157 Decided September 6, 2002, etc.)