logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.07.16 2012고정43
업무방해
Text

The accused shall be innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant owned the tolerances in Changwon-si Masan-si C, Changwon-si, and the victim D leased this Sub-Section and was provided with water necessary for penta-si.

The above ruling is connected to the electrical supply and demand system under the name of the defendant in the above E, and the victim was in charge of paying the electricity fee.

Around May 17, 2011, the Defendant knew about KRW 60,000 of the charges for the above electricity supply and demand device in arrears, and made it impossible to operate the said system by taking measures for cutting electricity supply and demand of the Defendant to supply electricity only when the Defendant applied for reuse when he applied for the termination of the use of electricity, and by demanding the Defendant not to receive a request for reuse even if he received it.

By doing so, the Defendant got the victim to be placed in a state where he could not receive water necessary for pension operations from the above time after the above time, thereby obstructing the victim’s pension business operations by force.

The defendant of "2012 High 502" was a person engaged in agriculture, and the victim D operated the rural experience center and camping center from the early July 201 to the Changwon-si F from Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and did not have a good appraisal of the victim by spreading the petition and accusation against the defendant due to interference of business, etc.

Therefore, for the purpose of interfering with the business, the Defendant interfered with his pension work by blocking the entry of the victim in Changwon-si G from the entrance of the H pension site operated by the victim in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si by using sckes, thereby obstructing the passage of customers and vehicles coming from the above mountain site.

2. Determination

A. The facts charged in the instant case are based on the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor regarding the obstruction of business due to a short-term measure (2012, fixed 43).

arrow