logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.03 2017나75981
계약금반환청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is that "2,394,895 won" is "2,394,842,895 won", "15 of the judgment of the court of first instance" in "2,394,895 won" in "2,84,842,895 won" in "the contract deposit" in "the contract deposit" in "the contract deposit" in "the 5th, 8, 6, 14, and 7th, "the witness A" in "A of the court of first instance", and "the sale permit of the 7th, 19" in "the sale permit" in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow