1. Attached Form among the instant lawsuit

1. The part demanding the revocation of each disposition described in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the list shall be dismissed;

2...

Details of the disposition

On November 30, 2007, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant an application for authorization to obtain authorization to establish a professional law school with a fixed number of 100 students. On July 4, 2008, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a final application for authorization to obtain authorization to establish a professional law school with a fixed number of 40 students (hereinafter “instant application”).

In the application of this case, when the plaintiff obtains authorization for the establishment of a professional law school from the defendant, he/she complies with the relevant statutes, the contents planned in the application, the matters determined by the defendant, etc., and stipulates a pledge to accept the corresponding disadvantage in the application when false facts

On September 1, 2008, the Defendant: (a) authorized the Plaintiff to establish a professional law school (hereinafter “instant authorization”); (b) attached additional clauses to the effect that the Plaintiff’s operation of a professional law school thoroughly abide by relevant statutes, such as the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Professional Law Schools (hereinafter “Law”) and the Higher Education Act; and (c) faithfully implement the application plan; and (d) if the Plaintiff fails to comply or implement it, administrative sanctions under relevant statutes may be taken.

(hereinafter referred to as "the father of this case"). On May 7, 2013, the defendant requested the plaintiff to submit inspection data to check whether the plan of this case has been properly implemented as of May 7, 2013.

On December 30, 2013, based on the data submitted by the Plaintiff, the Defendant: (a) decided to open 22 foreign language lectures to the Plaintiff on December 30, 2013; (b) as of 2012, foreign language lectures were not opened only 17, and (c) planned to maintain the dependence rate of 32.2% on the instant application.