beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) from November 12, 2013, to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 6 million, KRW 2 million, and each of the said money.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
Plaintiff
A is a student who was admitted to the H University sports department in 2013, and the Plaintiff B and C are the parents of the Plaintiff.
The defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates H University, and the co-defendant D, prior to the partial decision, is a professor of the HJ Team and a sports department. The co-defendant E, F, I, and J prior to the partial decision, are the arrangement of the Iski Team of Plaintiff A.
D, E, and F committed violence against Plaintiff A on November 26, 2013, and as a result, D was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 in Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 201Da14065 decided November 26, 2013 (Type 2013No. 290), E was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 200,000 in fine, and KRW 500,000 in fine, and F was finalized around that time.
E around 15:00 on December 22, 2012, on the ground that Plaintiff A was not in good condition during the sports hours, E was injured in need of medical treatment for 28 days, such as the patch straw, and the patch straw, which was caused by drinking and batching.
F) On January 22, 2013, the 16:00 (Local Time) was in progress in the Agro trokeer boiler room located in the Canadian Franchising-si on the ground that the Plaintiff Company was not running her own vision, and the Plaintiff Company’s distribution and shoulder were emitted on March 14, 2013 on the ground that the Plaintiff Company was not running her own vision in the Agro trokeer boiler room located in the Canadian Franchising-si, Canadian, and on March 14, 2013, around 14:10 on the ground that the Plaintiff did not respond to the question at the Hro Link on March 15, 2013, on the ground that the Plaintiff Company’s face was cut and the Plaintiff Company’s face was not opened from Hx on April 9, 2013 on the ground that the Plaintiff did not reply to the question.
D around 17:00 on April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff 811, as the HJ research institute, went away from the violence of the aforementioned vessels as above, and was off from the doping, and was at the time of being off with the cream.
Meanwhile, Plaintiff A filed a complaint with the purport that Plaintiff A was subject to insult, intimidation, assault, etc. from her ship I and J, but I and J were suspected of being in conflict with evidence on November 8, 2013.