logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.10 2013가단221019
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant: 60,678,30 won to the Plaintiff (Successors) and 5% per annum from November 20, 2013 to February 10, 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (Withdrawal) entered into an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “Moha”), Hyundai Liber Vehicle Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Mohacar”), is a company dealing with automobile insurance, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor succeeded to the Plaintiff’s rights and obligations associated with the instant case by the Hyundai Sea Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor”).

With respect to the automobiles A and B New Franch (2.0), the contract was entered into with respect to the personal automobile insurance containing the provision that compensates for losses suffered by the said automobiles due to the injury of the said automobiles caused by the intentional or negligent act by others. ② Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. and the insured entered into the personal automobile insurance contract containing the provision that compensates for losses suffered by the said company due to the damage of the said automobiles caused by the said automobiles due to the intentional or negligent act by others. ③ The said Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. and the information service technology Co., Ltd. as the insured, the contract was entered into with respect to the automobile insurance containing the provision that compensates for losses suffered by the said company due to the damage of the said automobiles caused by the said automobiles due to the intentional or negligent act by others. ④ The contract was entered into with respect to the automobile insurance containing the provision that compensates for losses suffered by the said company due to the damage of the said automobiles due to the said automobiles due to the intentional or negligent act by others.

B. The Defendant, as a project proprietor who constructed and sold an entrustment contract for the management of the Defendant and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, 8 I Apartment-si, 330, and other incidental and welfare facilities (hereinafter “instant apartment complex”), and Articles 43 and 43 (Management Body, etc.) of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 12115, Dec. 24, 2013) (1) of the same Act (amended by Act No. 12115, Dec. 24, 2013) (hereinafter “multi-family housing”) prescribed by Presidential Decree.

arrow