The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the process of being sealed with the victim by mistake of facts, the Defendant does not intentionally destroy the television amount so that it can be broken.

Although the defendant recognizes the fact that he was harming the victim, he did not intentionally inflict an injury on the victim.

B. Even if the conviction of an unreasonable sentencing is recognized, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The lower court determined that the part of the lower court’s statement is more reliable in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, i.e., (i) the victim B’s statement and the statement made by the prosecution; (ii) the content of the relevant facts; (iii) the relationship with the victim; (iv) the logical structure and circumstances at the time of the victim’s statement; (v) the motive for the victim to make a statement more favorable to the Defendant at court; and (v) the attitude of the victim’s statement in the court; (v) the victim’s statement made by the prosecution, including the victim’s statement, cannot be deemed to have been affected by the victim in the process of preventing the Defendant from knifeing the victim; and (v) the Defendant intentionally damaged the victim’s television on the ground that the Defendant intentionally destroyed the victim’s body and caused damage to the victim.