logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.10.16 2017고단1669
무고
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(Status of Defendants and Persons without Compensation) Defendant A, from May 2015, is a person operating a construction business chain F in substance, and Defendant B, as a representative director of the said FF in turn, has been operating the said company and has exceeded the actual operating rights of the said company to Defendant A around May 2015.

around May 14, 2015, the Defendants entered into a contract for the supply of sub-subcontracts and equipment with I and again entered into a contract for the re-subcontracts and equipment rental of part of the land, but the contract has been concluded due to the difference in the contract amount. Upon the Defendants’ demand for compensation for the cost of equipment already put into the site to the Defendants, the Defendants in the office of the Defendant-K located in Busan Metropolitan Government JJ on May 21, 2015 at the office of the Busan Metropolitan Government JJ (JJ), the Defendants: “50,000,000 won for H site inputs and preservation costs.”

8. A written statement of agreement to the effect that the payment shall be made by 30.0 was made to the recipient.

However, the Defendants did not perform their respective contents until August 30, 2015, respectively, based on each written execution of the above agreement. Around September 2, 2015, the Defendants appears to have made a provisional attachment and continued to file a civil lawsuit against the third party, which was based on each written execution of the above agreement, against the third party, against the construction company, which was in charge of operating FF in the capacity to pay for the Defendants. However, the Defendants made a false complaint against the third party as if the third party, by threatening the Defendants, was forced to escape the performance of his/her obligations under each written execution agreement.

(2) On September 1, 2015, Defendant A prepared a false complaint against a person without prison labor for the purpose of having the person without prison labor punished by Defendant A at an attorney M legal office located in Busan-gu L, Busan-do. The complaint is filed by the person without prison labor for the purpose of having the person with no criminal punishment.

arrow