logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.11 2019고단5315
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 8, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an employee of the Singingishing operations who received a statement from the Defendant that “if he collects cash in compliance with his instructions, he would pay a separate allowance of KRW 100,000 per day, and according to the amount of cash collected; (b) in response to the proposal, he was aware of the fact that the funds may be the amount of money from the Singishing damage, the Defendant was working as a cash collection account from April 8, 2019 to May 16, 2019.

On May 15, 2019, an employee in the name light of the Ssingish cam cam cam cam cam cambling the victim B by misrepresenting the victim B with a telephone at a non-place on behalf of May 15, 2019, and “a loan can be made up to 4.3% per annum, and 40 million won per annum, if an existing loan is repaid.” It was transferred from the victim B to the F Bank account in the name of E (G) under the pretext of repayment of the loan from the victim B, and then again transferred the money to the victim B on May 16, 2019, by taking the phone from May 16, 2019 to “a loan can be made because the record in arrears remains in the guarantee insurance company, 6.8 million won transfer from H’s I Association account (J) on the same day to the total amount of KRW 36.6.8 million from May 16, 2019 to the victim’s account.

At around 11:00 on May 16, 2019, the Defendant, according to the direction of the Defendant, opened the account in the name-free bank account under the name-free bank account in the name-free bank account of a limited liability company (M), and was discovered to receive additional KRW 22 million from the above H around 14:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the employee of the name scam scam scam scams by deceiving victims, deceiving the victims, and aiding and abetting the defendants by facilitating the above crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each police officer with H and B.

arrow