logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.03.06 2016가단10846
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On May 11, 2006, Jinju-si received a subsidy of KRW 4,224,00 in accordance with the fruit trees reduction support project in 2005 for the Defendant, among KRW 14,758 square meters of C forest land in Jinju-si (hereinafter “the instant forest”).

On April 4, 2007, the forest land of this case was designated as a zone subject to the prohibition of removal of pine trees pursuant to Article 9 of the Special Act on the Prevention of pine wilt Diseases.

On September 27, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the purchase of landscape trees (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”) with the Defendant, using a real estate lease contract form, KRW 200,00,000,000,000 (hereinafter referred to as “instant pine trees”) owned by the Defendant on the ground of Jinju-si (the payment date of KRW 5,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000). Article 4 of the said contract states that “The period of the preceding year shall be 36 months from the date of ordering the lessee to engage in real estate.” The lower part of the contract states that “The payment date of KRW 5,00,00,000,000,00,000,00,00.

On September 27, 2012, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the remainder of KRW 30 million on October 17, 2012, respectively.

On September 7, 2015, the Plaintiff instructed D to take 60 glue trees out of the instant pine trees into the 707m2 and the 581m20m2 prior to Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and the 581m2.

On September 17, 2015, the Defendant applied for the issuance of the certificate of pine wilt infection to remove 50gs of pine trees by making the extraction place G in Gyeongcheon-si and the moving place as H in Y in Gohapcheon-gun, Gohap-gun. The Defendant was issued the next day.

On March 18, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s home to discuss the instant sales contract with his branch, and among them, discussed the following matters.

A person who has not received his/her name: Shells or slick so that he/she can do so only once.

At present, the plaintiff is the same reason as the plaintiff.

arrow