A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a vehicle BM520

On February 9, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.137% 0.137% around 08:43, and proceeded to turn to the left at the two-lanes in the direction of yellow dust distance in front of the welfare center for disabled persons, the 45-lane in front of the welfare center for disabled persons.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant entered the said intersection in violation of the red signal signal, etc. installed at the said intersection, and caused the victim C (the 56-year-old driver) driver’s failure to turn left and left at the right turn to the left at the opposite direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and the Defendant shocked the victim C (the 56-year-old driver’s length) driver’s front speed of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven a car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury, such as light fluoral salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. On June 9, 2008, the Defendant has been issued a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won by the Seoul Central District Court for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.137% at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1), was driving a BM520 vehicle at approximately 800 meters away from the point of accident set forth in paragraph (1) in front of the Hanam-si E apartment to the point of accident set forth in paragraph (1) before the restaurant, violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written statement in the Defendant’s legal statement C (13 pages) traffic accident report (1) and photographs at the scene of the accident;