Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On May 27, 2013, at around 21:30 on May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim, such as the victim’s chest and shoulder who tried to open a door to prevent the victim from opening the door in front of the defective victim, who filed a complaint with the victim E office operated by the victim D, in the middle of the E office operated by the victim D, with the victim D; (b) the F, who tried to open the door, obstructed the victim from opening the door.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(2) of the Criminal Act. On January 15, 2014, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant in this court, and thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.