logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.01.12 2015가단129251
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 80,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 29, 2016 to January 12, 2017, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a)be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

B. 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant currently are the legal couple in a divorce suit under the Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Dhap306340 (principal suit) and 309486 (Counterclaim). 2) The Plaintiff is a creditor who, as a representative director, was a shareholder holding 78.8% (including 45% of the title trustee F) of the shares of the Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Company”) in which the Defendant is working as a representative director, and was a surety to secure a property right on the loans of Han Bank of Han Bank of the non-party company, a creditor who, on April 2, 2010, has a claim for the same amount of indemnity against the non-party company.

3) On August 12, 2005, the Defendant established a non-party company of KRW 100 million in capital for the purpose of operating a private teaching institute, educational information industry and human resources supply business, lifelong educational facilities business, online education business, etc. The Defendant, as the representative director of the non-party company, added the "workplace skill development training business" on April 18, 2007 to the purpose of the non-party company; the non-party company's capital was increased to KRW 20 million on December 24, 2008; the non-party company's capital was increased to KRW 30 million on December 27, 2008; on January 6, 2009, the non-party company was established with the name of "E", the head office of the non-party company was reported as a knowledge and human resources development business-related lifelong educational establishment at the Yongsan-gu Office of Education (Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of Education which is the head office of the non-party company; the defendant received the report from the non-party company as the non-party company.

arrow