Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2018, 01:26, the Defendant was urged to return home from the police officer affiliated with the police box of the police station C, who was called by the Defendant and was called by the Defendant at the front of 107 Dong-ju apartment 107 dong-ro, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, 2018.

씨 발 자슥아, 민주경찰이 이래도 되나. ”라고 욕설을 하면서 D의 외근 조끼를 손으로 잡아당겨 찢어지게 하는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include a criminal record for which the defendant was punished for several violent crimes, and the defendant was sentenced to two years of probation in September 2017 to a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Persons with Disabilities at the Changwon District Court for the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Persons with Disabilities, which has long been sentenced to two years of probation on September 2017, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good. However, the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case in the course of probation by drinking, and the defendant was committed the crime of this case in the course of probation. The confession was made, and his mistake was divided, and the criminal record other than the above suspended sentence is divided for a considerable period of time. The degree of interference with the assault of this case and official duties of this case is not more serious, and if the suspended sentence becomes invalidated by imprisonment with prison labor, it is deemed that the defendant would be too harsh.