logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.09.19 2018나38205
관리비
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s status, is a management body established by consisting of sectional owners of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ground A Condominium (hereinafter “instant condominium building”).

The building of this case is the 6th underground floor and the 13th ground floor in around 2007, and the 1,644 units for divided stores (from underground 2 to 8th floor) and the 1,620 units for sectional owners are buildings newly constructed for sales facilities, apartment houses, business facilities, and educational and research facilities.

B. The Plaintiff’s management fee imposition 1) details related to the management fee are as follows. The management company or the representative committee of the management company or the representative committee of Article 28 (Management Expenses) may impose management fees on sectional owners or occupants. 1. Management expenses are calculated based on the number of houses sold. 2. Management expenses include operating expenses, taxes and public charges necessary for the maintenance and repair of facilities and the public portion, and other minimum expenses for public welfare. 2) The Plaintiff imposed and paid monthly management expenses on the instant building owners and lessees in accordance with the management rules and the resolution of the representative committee, etc., and imposed KRW 2,00,000 per month on a shop in a public room.

C. Around July 2010, the Plaintiff’s management of the instant building: (a) around July 2010, D leased part of the fourth to seventh floor of the instant building from E and operated a trading hole; (b) from around September 2013, F thereafter operated the said trading hole; (c) on January 2, 2015, the owners of the instant building retired from the said leased part; (d) filed a lawsuit against D, etc. against the Seoul Western District Court 2014Ga3001 building name on the ground that the owners of the instant building had failed to pay rent, etc.; and (e) on December 28, 2014, the Plaintiff leased part of the instant building from D to the fourth to seventh floor of the instant building on the ground that management expenses incurred by the said futures company was overdue.

arrow