The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an insurance contract of automobile type with respect to the automobile type with respect to the B U.S. passenger car owned by A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid operator who has entered into a mutual aid contract with respect to C bus (hereinafter “Defendant bus”).

B. At around 10:30 on April 26, 2014, A, driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle from the right-side to the right-side surface in the direction of the eart distance between the two-lanes in front of the eart lifelong learning hall in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant bus driving ahead of the same direction, attempted to change its course to the right-side right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On May 30, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 463,000 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry or video of Gap's evidence 1 to 5, purport of whole pleading

2. The plaintiff argued by the parties that the accident in this case is a previous cause caused by negligence, such as violation of the method of changing the course of the driver of the defendant bus who tried to change the course of the vehicle in this case, on the ground that the driver of the defendant bus driving with the one-lane vehicle tried to change the course of the vehicle in the same direction as the driver of the plaintiff bus driving the two-lane vehicle in the same direction, without flickering the direction direction, etc., and the driver of the vehicle driving with the two-lane vehicle driving with the same direction from the front side of the defendant bus try to avoid it. On the other hand, the defendant tried to change the course of the vehicle normally while giving a warning to the direction of the bus in this case, while the driver of the vehicle in this case tried to change the course of the vehicle in this case.