Text
1. The Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet,
A. Defendant B shall indicate the 16th, 15, 15-1, 15-2, 6, 5, 5.
Reasons
1. The following facts are deemed to have been led to the confession of Defendant C between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C. The Plaintiff and the remaining Defendants may be acknowledged either as having no dispute between the parties, or as a whole by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and evidence Nos. 6.
G’s building extension G owned the building extension permission to construct the buildings listed in attached Table 3 (hereinafter “the instant existing building”) on the remainder of the instant land, excluding the instant existing building site, on December 31, 1984, where the building owner was granted a building permission for G on December 31, 1984, and on December 5, 1985.
B. G on December 27, 1985, each of the instant lands and the existing building of this case, and G on December 27, 1985, respectively, shall be the land of this case and the existing building of this case, which is a joint mortgage creation and auction commencement of the existing building of this case.
(2) In the future, the registration of creation of a mortgage on each of the instant lands and the instant existing buildings was initiated through the execution of the right to collateral security by Choung Bank. In the auction procedure, on February 26, 1988, Choung Bank was awarded a successful bid on each of the instant land and the instant existing building.
C. On June 21, 198, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract to purchase each of the instant land and the instant existing building in the form of KRW 1,139,100,000, and paid part of the purchase price between L and M on August 11, 1989.