The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant acknowledges and reflects the instant crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the same crime and of suspension of qualification.

In addition, some of the members of the DNA Victim Countermeasures Committee wanted to have the defendant's wife during the trial of the court below, and the defendant's wife was submitted in the trial of the court below, and there are circumstances in which the defendant's wife was submitted.

However, the crime of this case is an act of acting as an agent in the case in which the defendant, without qualification as a lawyer, recruited the victims of the Daccco World Co., Ltd. as a participant in the lawsuit, and then brought a lawsuit against the above company and received 80% of the winning amount, and then the defendant committed the act of acting as an agent in the lawsuit. Such a crime requires strict punishment in that it goes against the attorney system to protect the interests of the parties and other interested persons, to promote the fairness of legal life

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.