1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,362,877 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from December 29, 2012 to August 20, 2014.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, and 6.

(1) On May 10, 2010, the Defendant entered into a business agreement with the Plaintiff to jointly operate the instant cafeteria (hereinafter “instant cafeteria”) with the Seongbuk-gu Seoul 2’s “D” cafeteria (hereinafter “instant cafeteria”).

The main contents of the instant agreement are as follows.

㈎ 피고는 이 사건 중식당의 자산을 200,000,000원으로 평가하여 그 중 25%를 원고에게 50,000,000원에 양도한다

(제2조). ㈏ 이익 정산은 매월 5일 전월 영업실적을 기초로 협의하여 배분하며(제4조), 영업 손실은 결산시 지분에 따라 정산한다

(제5조). ㈐ 동업자간 사정에 의해 제3자에게 지분을 양도하고자 할 때에는 상호 동의를 얻어 할 수 있고(제6조), 운영에 중대한 사안이 발생하여 이 사건 중식당을 폐업 또는 양도로 청산이 불가피한 경우 자산과 부채를 동업자 지분비율로 정산한다

(7) Article 7). After the agreement on the same business of this case, the proper operation of the restaurant of this case continues, and the financial aggravation has become impossible to distribute profits entirely after October 2010, the dispute over criticism and responsibility for the other party regarding the failure of management has been continued because the relationship with the Plaintiff became worse, and after December 2010, the Plaintiff did not attend the restaurant of this case and did not participate in the management.

The plaintiff around June 201, around 2011, laid the restaurant of this case into the real property in the real property.

x) The defendant, on December 23, 201, has been operating the restaurant in this case to the plaintiff on December 23, 201, so if the plaintiff did not provide measures to the plaintiff until December 30, 201, the restaurant in this case shall be arranged and shares in this case in accordance with Article 7 of the business agreement in this case.