1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The defendant bears the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The Land Survey Board prepared by the Korea Land Survey Board in the Korea Land Survey Board in the Korea Land Survey Board in the Korea Land Survey Board in the Korea Land Survey Board is written by C as the owner of the 313 square meters B of Gyeonggi-gun B (after conversion registration into the area, the 1,035 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun B, Gyeonggi-do; hereinafter “instant land”). The address of the owner is a blank space.

B. However, the former land cadastre concerning the instant land indicated that the said land was transferred to “L residing in K” after being examined by C in 1914 (3 years 1914).

C. Meanwhile, the Gyeonggi-si N through O, G, or I’s land was also assessed against C. However, the double P and Q land was based on the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Ownership, etc. (Act No. 3094) on July 1, 1981 and the registration of ownership transfer was based on the Plaintiff’s name in the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Ownership, etc. (Act No. 3094), and the registration of ownership transfer was based on the Plaintiff’s name in the name of the said Act on July 18, 1981 for the land, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Plaintiff’s name in the Act on Special Measures for the Management of Ownership, etc. (Act No. 4502) on March 30, 1994 for the land, and the registration of ownership transfer was unregistered.

In addition, on July 19, 1996, the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership (hereinafter “registration of initial ownership”) by the District Court of Jung-gu under Article 9100 of the receipt of the family registry office of Eunpyeong District Court as to the instant land.

E. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s prior tenant D had his permanent domicile in Gyeonggi-si E. However, as the above D died on August 20, 1956, F succeeded to the property, and the Plaintiff, etc., who was an son, succeeded to the property on March 7, 1969.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that C as indicated in the land survey injury on the land of this case is the same person as D, the plaintiff's fleet, and there is a separate assessment title as to the land of this case.