logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.09.19 2012고정58
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the president who operates the Gu D Hospital during Ansan-si, and is a person who directly participates in the overall operation of the hospital, or supervises or supervises the employees of the hospital, such as the examination and treatment of patients of the above hospital, surgery, entrance and discharge, and issuance of a medical certificate of entrance and discharge.

On May 1, 2010, the Defendant, at the above hospital, had E, who suffered minor injuries not to be hospitalized due to traffic accidents, registered as an in-patient of the above hospital, and issued a written confirmation of entrance discharge to E from the above hospital on May 10, 201 to the 10th of the same month, as E received hospitalized treatment from May 1, 2010 to the 10th of the same month.

However, in fact, E freely visits home and company without undergoing hospital treatment at the above hospital during the above period.

As above, the Defendant issued a false certificate of discharge from entry to E. On May 10, 2010, upon submitting a certificate of discharge from entry to the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. on May 10, 2010, filed a claim for the payment of the insurance money, and filed a claim for the payment of the insurance money with the victim insurance company for hospitalized treatment expenses

5. A total of KRW 1,081,741, including KRW 596,701, under the same name as of 27.20, together with the receipt of KRW 1,081,741, a total of 20 patients from around that time to September 10, 2010 as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and the above patients were paid KRW 14,315,982 from the victim insurance companies as the above method as the expenses for hospitalized treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E and 19 others, obtained 14,315,982 won from the victim insurance company and acquired it by fraud.

2. According to each of the evidence of this case, the Defendant did not receive proper hospitalization, such as diving out from the outside during the period of hospitalization or from time to time, after the patients listed in the attached list of crimes were hospitalized in the D Hospital operated by the Defendant.

arrow