Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years, and Defendant N, for not more than six months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant N.

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 1234] Defendant A provided a mobile phone by deceiving the wholesalers of the mobile phone to normally join and distribute the mobile phone, and then inducing them to join the mobile phone under the pretext of inducing them to damage small loans to many unspecified persons, using the documents necessary for opening the mobile phone, such as a copy of identification card, etc., which was received from them, and opened the mobile phone using them, and attempted to dispose of the mobile phone which was either distributed or not opened by using the 's 's mobile phone', etc., and registered the business under the name of Qgu, the name of the 'R' and the 'T' under the name of Qgu, the president of the 'bane', and Defendant N worked as an employee at the store of A.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 21, 2011, the Defendant told the victim V of the “R” store on the first floor of the first floor of the building in Sungnam-si, U.S. to borrow KRW 150,000 in return for the opening of a mobile phone, and to pay the terminal price and the telephone fee on behalf of the mobile phone.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price and the telephone fee.

The defendant, in the name of the victim, used a total of 1.20,000 won, such as the terminal price, by allowing the victim to open Samsung Tallon in the name of the victim, and caused the victim to pay by subrogation.

As a result, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

B. On December 15, 2011, when the Defendant opened a mobile phone with the victim W from the said R Burial, the Defendant said that 1.50,000 won will be loaned in return for the opening of the mobile phone, and that 1.50,000 won will be paid in lieu of the terminal price and the telephone fee.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price and the telephone fee.

The defendant allowed the victim to open a mobile phone in the name of the victim, used a total of 897,746 won, such as the cost of the terminal, and had the victim pay it by subrogation.