The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (two years of suspended execution in six months of imprisonment, and eight hours of community service order) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. However, the defendant recognized and reflected the crime.

However, in order to protect the legitimate performance of official duties of the state and establish a sound social order, it is necessary to strictly punish the interference with the performance of official duties.

The defendant has been punished for the same crime, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case under several times.

The defendant did not make efforts to recover from or restore damage to the victims.

In addition, in full view of all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and method of committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too large. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.