logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.10.06 2016고단22
사기등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the status of the defendant A and B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B worked as the representative director of the CF at regular Eup from around October 2007 to October 2012. From around October 2012, Defendant A and Defendant B had been actually operating the said association from around October 2012 to the present date, and are between Defendant B and the land.

In order to promote the F business from January 2009 to March 2, 2009, the victim Jung-Eup provided funds necessary for the purchase of liquid manure, transportation equipment, spraying equipment, and track by designating local agricultural partnership corporations as business operators.

The Defendants applied for the above FF project as if Defendant A was in need of spreading 15,00 Lergs, 16.5 tons, 135 Emboxes, and 135 Emboos, the transportation equipment, and conspired Defendant B, who is not entitled to apply for the project, to pay his share of expenses necessary for the purchase of the above Emboos, and to use the said Emboos.

According to the above public contest, Defendant A was selected from the Si of Jung-Eup on February 18, 2009 as a person subject to the F Project in accordance with the public contest and this year.

2. Around 25. Around the 25. G-Myeon office submitted an application for subsidies to the effect that 119,200,000 won is necessary for the purchase of lags, lags, and lags, 116,100,000 won, and 8,500,000 won is necessary for the purchase of spraying machines to a person in charge of whom the name of lags and lags cannot

However, in fact, even if Defendant A received a subsidy from Maglas, Maglas, Maglas, Maglas, Baglas, Baglas, and spawor, he had the intention to receive the payment from Defendant B and deliver it to Defendant B, and thus, Defendant A did not have the intention or ability to use the Baglas for the F business.

Defendant

A around March 25, 2009, from the account in the name of Defendant B (Account Number C) to the account in the name of CF in the name of CF, A received KRW 48 million from March 25, 2009.

Since then, Defendant A deceiving a person in charge of the Francing and viewing Franc as above, and its member is from the time of Jung-Eup.

4.3.

arrow