A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one and half years.

One light of the seized test color, and one hand, portable date, and one hand.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 years for a crime of larceny, and 2 years for a short term of 1 year and 6 years for a short term of 1 year and 3 years for a crime of larceny in night building at the branch court of the Seoul District Court on January 13, 1998 at the branch court of the Seoul District Court on April 21, 200, 1 year and 6 months for a special larceny, etc. at the Seoul District Court on February 25, 2003 at the Government's branch court of the Seoul District Court on February 25, 2003, 1 year and 6 months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Seoul Western District Court on February 3, 2005, and 3 years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on October 19, 206.

After that, on March 19, 2014, the Seoul East Eastern District Court sentenced two years to confiscation or imprisonment with prison labor for attempted larceny, etc., and decided on March 27, 2014, and is currently under probation.

On September 16, 2014, at around 08:26, the Defendant opened a closed door at the “Diplomatic Association” located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, where the victim E, who is a pastor, opened a closed door at the 8th floor office, and took the inside of the door, such as the hand gate, in order to steals the cash, which is located in the corridor of the first floor above the underground floor, and did not bring the intent of unconstitutionality, but did not go against the attempted attempt. Then, in light of the inside, the Defendant did not intend to steal the cash, which is located in the corridor of the second floor above the underground floor, but did not go against the intent of unconstitutionality.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to steals the property managed habitually by the victim, but he attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the victim;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Habituality of the holding: Application of the damp-style Act and subordinate statutes, in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the holding;