1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the Defendant 2,981,539 won and its related amount from October 28, 2014 to June 30, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. From June 1, 2012, the Defendant operated an beauty business establishment with the trade name “D” in subparagraphs C and 408 of the Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si.

B. On October 15, 2013, the Plaintiff received an oral surgery from the Defendant at the above beauty and art business establishment to reflect the eyebrow, the baby, etc.

C. On October 16, 2013, the following day of the above procedure, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “Eficial contact skin infection and ficial infections around the old end of the Gu” in the “Eficial assessment.”

The term "post-post treatment opinion" in the medical certificate issued by the above hospital doctor means that "the plaintiff is found to require administration of medicine, such as antibiotic drugs and chlorates, etc. for about a week in the future after he/she has been subject to an oral surgery reflecting the oral surgery on the eyebrow, the mouth, and the mouth for the entrance and its surrounding parts, resulting in dynafic reaction accompanied by the dynaf, and around a week in the future."

On October 17, 2013, the following day, the Plaintiff received medical treatment in the same symptoms as the Sungnam University Hospital, and received medical treatment at the same hospital on October 22, 2013, October 25, 2013, and November 1, 201 of the same year.

E. After that, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition against the Defendant’s illegal treatment at the time of Sungnam, and on November 22, 2013, the Sungnam Mayor filed a complaint against the Defendant with the branch police station as a violation of the Medical Service Act.

On December 26, 2013, the Defendant was indicted of the crime that stated that “the Defendant, even though not a medical person, received 500,000 won from the Plaintiff and performed surgery using the device, such as eyebrow, baby, arct, etc.,” and received a summary order of KRW 2,00,00,000 from the Defendant around October 15, 2013.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 3-1 through 3, Gap evidence Nos. 4-1 through 7, Gap evidence Nos. 5-1, 2, Gap evidence Nos. 6-1 through 3, Gap evidence Nos. 7-1, 7-2, Gap evidence Nos. 8 through 14, Gap evidence Nos. 15-1, 2, and 16-18, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff.