The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the plaintiff's grounds for appeal as the grounds for appeal or the determination of a new assertion as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

2. Additional determination as to the Plaintiff’s assertion in this Court

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that: (a) the Plaintiff places an obstacle on the instant agreement made up of about six months retroactively, as it is difficult to recover KRW 200 million leased to the Defendant; (b) even in the case of the Investment Convention (Evidence A) dated 14, 2014, it cannot be deemed that such investment agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff and E; and (c) if the money was not extended to the Defendant on October 19, 2016, to the apartment owned by the Plaintiff on July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that “the maximum claim amount of KRW 350,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00.

B. In light of the following circumstances as revealed in light of the overall purport of the evidence presented, the court below rejected the probative value of the agreement of this case and lent the above KRW 200 million to the Defendant.