logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고단2949
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was parked on the front road located in Gwangju Northern-gu C around July 13, 2018, around 13:50

E opening the top door of the ERa cargo 150,000 won in cash owned by the victim F, 100,000 won in new global merchandise coupons 10,000 won in cash, 3 of Earsenium 200,000 won in the market price, 1 of Earsenium knum strings (200,000 won in the market price), 1 of other handcings (200,000 won in the market price), cosmetics (50,000 won in the market price), 1 of handbags (50,000 won in the market price) between banks in the name of G, and 1 of the handbags (50,000 won in the market price), etc.

2. On July 13, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny by inserting the physical card in the name of G and withdrawing KRW 500,000 in cash from the said bank located in the same metropolitan branch of the victim bank, a new bank located in 154, as stated in the Dong-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, at around 14:40 on July 13, 2018, but did not know of the password and did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph (the list Nos. 2, 5, 8, 13, 15, 23);

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. An appraisal report, a fingerprint appraisal report, and a gene appraisal report;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of the nominal holder of a new bank check) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to the relevant criminal facts (a point of intention) and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of attempted larceny) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. In light of the former part of Article 37 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, each of the crimes of this case committed again during the period of probation of imprisonment for the same kind of crime for sentencing, and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes, etc., the defendant is deemed to have a high risk of re-offending; on the other hand, the defendant's mistake is recognized; and part of damage has been recovered;

arrow